Well-Behaved Women Rarely Make History
The woman who coined this now famous phrase was one of the founding members of a the Exponent 2 (a feminist, Mormon magazine) along with my mom and others. Laurel Thacher Ulrich is a well-renowned Pulitzer Prize winning author and tenured Harvard professor. I just got back from a fireside where she spoke. It made me think about a lot of things. This is my attempt to organize my thoughts.
1) Success later in life
Much of her "success" (including her education) occurred during and after raising her 5 kids. That gives me hope. Not that I crave worldly success, but the knowledge that life doesn't end with kids nor after kids. Life can go on concurrently with kids.
2) My part in history
A few things she said about history:
2) My part in history
A few things she said about history:
- History is an account of the past based on recorded sources.
- History is a shouting match between past and present: the present historian interprets the past.
My interpretation:
If I don't record my present, I will have no part in history.
What if the history of the majority of my generation boils down to insipid memes?
Today I read Jarom, a tiny book in the Book of Mormon. As I read it, I thought: this guy was busy with wars etc. He also had a healthy dose of self-doubt. He didn't think he could add much spiritual enlightenment beyond what had already been written. In other words, there was too much going on in his worldly life, and at the same time there wasn't enough going on spiritually= a great excuse not to record history.
I get it.
3) My fear and then embrace of church history
Sis Ulrich mentioned 3 takeaways of her talk:
- Things in the church change.
- People in the past (in and out of the church) were unlike us: they had a different view of most things. The past is a foreign country, and sometimes a different galaxy.
- People in the past are a lot like us. Gender issues, etc are not modern phenomena.
I have a vivid memory from when I was about 5, walking down a street in downtown Belmont, MA with my older sister Alexis. I asked her why women didn't have the priesthood. She gave an utterly unsatisfactory answer; she was born a femi-nazi.
Understanding isn't always in our grasp.
Then there was a freshman sociology class in which the professor debunked all traditional polygamy "excuses": there wasn't an overabundance of widows nor a dearth of men and polygamy didn't increase posterity. The conclusion was that there was no logical explanation for polygamy.
Logic can't explain everything.
And that doesn't scare me like it used to.
In literature, there is a strategy called "suspension of disbelief"; if you are reading a story about space aliens, you keep reading even though you're not sure they exist so that you can understand the whole picture.
What if we could all practice suspension of judgement: if you don't have enough evidence gathered, common ground, understanding of the circumstances (which we almost never do)...
Simply, don't judge.
That's applicable to faith, relationships across all boundaries, and mostly everything else.
Just like Ulrich mentioned, people are exactly like us = look for commonalities!
And people are nothing like us = be patient and kind before reaching a conclusion...
or don't reach a conclusion.
or don't reach a conclusion.
The same goes for faith. Never hinge all that is important on perceived incongruence.
Suspend judgement until facts are gathered.
This often takes a lifetime
or two.
Ulrich wrote an article in the New York Times yesterday. I'm off to read it...
